fbpx
The Invention of Single-Sideband Modulation

The Invention of Single-Sideband Modulation

by

Introduction

Radio communication began in the late 19th century, serving as a method to transmit information wirelessly over long distances. Early radio systems relied on basic forms of modulation to encode signals onto carrier waves. These systems enabled the first steps in voice and data transmission, leading to the development of more advanced techniques.

Modulation techniques are crucial in radio communication. They allow the encoding of information, such as voice or data, onto a carrier wave. This process optimizes the use of bandwidth, improves signal clarity, and enables long-distance communication. Amplitude Modulation (AM) and Frequency Modulation (FM) were among the earliest techniques, each with its advantages and limitations. The need for more efficient methods became apparent as radio technology evolved.

Single-sideband modulation (SSB) represents a significant advancement in this evolution. It offered a more efficient use of bandwidth and power compared to AM. This article examines the historical development of SSB and its impact on amateur radio, highlighting why it became a preferred method for long-distance communication among radio operators.

Historical Context

Early Radio Transmission Methods

Spark-Gap Transmitters

Spark Gap Transmitter
Spark Gap Transmitter
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Spark_gap_transmitter_diagram_(alt).png

Spark-gap transmitters were among the earliest methods used for radio transmission, dating back to the late 19th and early 20th centuries. They generated radio waves through an electrical spark, producing a broad spectrum of frequencies. This method allowed for the transmission of Morse code but was inefficient and prone to interference. Spark-gap transmitters were soon regulated and eventually replaced due to their inability to provide continuous waves or support more advanced modulation techniques.

Continuous Wave (CW) Transmission

The development of continuous wave (CW) transmission marked a significant improvement. CW transmitters, utilizing vacuum tube oscillators, generated a single, steady frequency. Unlike spark-gap transmitters, CW allowed for more efficient and clearer communication. This method was particularly suited for Morse code transmission, leading to its adoption as a standard for early radio communication. However, while CW was an advancement, it still had limitations, as it was primarily used for on-off keying rather than carrying more complex signals like voice or music.

Development of Amplitude Modulation (AM)

Principles of AM

Amplitude Modulation (AM) was the first technique that enabled the transmission of audio signals, such as voice and music, over radio waves. In AM, the amplitude of the carrier wave varies in proportion to the instantaneous value of the audio signal. Mathematically, an AM signal can be expressed as:

s(t) = [A_c + A_m \cos(2 \pi f_m t)] \cos(2 \pi f_c t)

where A_c is the carrier amplitude, A_m is the amplitude of the modulating signal, f_c is the carrier frequency, and f_m is the modulating signal frequency. This modulation allowed for the simultaneous transmission of voice signals along with a carrier frequency, facilitating more complex and versatile communication.

Limitations of AM in Spectrum Efficiency and Power Usage

AM transmission was a significant advancement, but it had inherent limitations. Each AM signal occupied a bandwidth twice the maximum frequency of the audio signal, resulting in inefficient use of the radio spectrum. For example, a voice signal with a bandwidth of 3 kHz required a total bandwidth of 6 kHz for transmission. Additionally, AM signals consisted of a carrier and two identical sidebands, each carrying the same information. This redundancy meant that a considerable portion of the transmitted power was wasted on the carrier and one of the sidebands, reducing overall transmission efficiency. These limitations highlighted the need for more spectrum-efficient and power-efficient modulation techniques, leading to the exploration of alternatives like single-sideband modulation.

The Need for Improvement

Spectrum Congestion in Early Radio Communication

As radio communication gained popularity in the early 20th century, the radio spectrum became increasingly congested. AM transmission required a wide bandwidth, with each signal occupying twice the maximum frequency of the modulating signal. In practice, this led to significant overlap and interference, especially in bands allocated to amateur radio, maritime communication, and commercial broadcasting. The lack of efficient frequency allocation exacerbated congestion, limiting the number of usable channels and leading to the need for more spectrum-efficient modulation methods.

Power Efficiency Concerns

AM transmission was inherently power-inefficient. The carrier signal in AM carried no useful information but consumed the majority of the transmitted power. The two identical sidebands also resulted in a duplication of the transmitted data, meaning half of the transmitted power was effectively redundant. In high-power transmissions, such as those used in long-distance communication, this inefficiency translated to higher operational costs and technical challenges, including the need for more powerful transmitters and larger antennas.

Desire for Improved Signal-to-Noise Ratio

AM signals were also susceptible to noise and interference. Since noise typically affects the amplitude of the received signal, it directly degraded the quality of AM transmissions. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for AM was often poor, particularly over long distances or in environments with high levels of electromagnetic interference. This resulted in noisy and distorted reception, which was a significant drawback for applications requiring clear voice communication, such as amateur radio. Improving SNR became a priority, driving the search for modulation techniques that could deliver clearer signals with less power and bandwidth.

Theoretical Foundations

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Single-sideband_derivation.svg

Fourier Analysis of Modulated Signals

Fourier analysis provides a method to decompose a complex signal into its constituent sinusoidal components. In the context of modulated signals, Fourier analysis reveals how a carrier signal and its modulation produce sidebands in the frequency domain. For a modulated signal, the Fourier transform breaks down the signal into a carrier frequency and additional frequencies resulting from the modulation process. This analysis is crucial for understanding how modulation techniques use the available spectrum. In amplitude modulation (AM), the modulating signal’s frequency components produce symmetrical sidebands around the carrier frequency, each carrying the same information.

Concept of Sidebands in Amplitude Modulation

In AM, when a carrier wave is modulated by an audio signal, the result is the generation of two sidebands: the upper sideband (USB) and the lower sideband (LSB). These sidebands are mirror images of each other and contain the same information. The upper sideband is located at frequencies above the carrier frequency, while the lower sideband is below it. Mathematically, if the carrier frequency is f_c and the modulating signal has a maximum frequency f_m, the AM signal occupies a bandwidth ranging from f_c - f_m to f_c + f_m. The total bandwidth of an AM signal is thus 2f_m. The presence of both sidebands and the carrier leads to inefficient use of spectrum and power, as the same information is redundantly transmitted.

Mathematical Representation of AM Signal

The mathematical expression of an AM signal is given by:

s(t) = A_c \left[ 1 + m \cos(2 \pi f_m t) \right] \cos(2 \pi f_c t)

Here:

  • A_c is the amplitude of the carrier.
  • m is the modulation index, defined as the ratio of the amplitude of the modulating signal to the amplitude of the carrier.
  • f_c is the carrier frequency.
  • f_m is the frequency of the modulating signal.

Expanding this equation using trigonometric identities shows the carrier and sidebands:

s(t) = A_c \cos(2 \pi f_c t) + \frac{m A_c}{2} \left[ \cos\left( 2 \pi (f_c + f_m) t \right) + \cos\left( 2 \pi (f_c - f_m) t \right) \right]

This expression illustrates that an AM signal consists of a carrier component A_c \cos(2 \pi f_c t) and two sideband components, each occupying additional spectrum around the carrier frequency. The redundancy in transmitting both sidebands while containing identical information is a key inefficiency that single-sideband modulation (SSB) seeks to address.

The Invention of Single-Sideband Modulation

John Renshaw Carson’s Work at AT&T (1915)

Carson’s Paper: “Method and Means for Signaling with High-Frequency Waves”

John Renshaw Carson, an engineer at AT&T, made a significant contribution to the development of single-sideband modulation (SSB) in 1915. In his seminal paper, “Method and Means for Signaling with High-Frequency Waves,” Carson proposed a method to improve the efficiency of amplitude modulation. He outlined the idea of suppressing one of the sidebands and the carrier, transmitting only a single sideband. This technique aimed to reduce the bandwidth and power requirements of AM transmissions while preserving the transmitted information.

Theoretical Basis for SSB

Carson’s work provided the mathematical foundation for SSB. He demonstrated that, in an AM signal, both sidebands carry the same information, making the transmission of both redundant. By using only one sideband, it was possible to halve the bandwidth required for the transmission. Moreover, by eliminating the carrier, additional power savings could be achieved. The mathematical representation of an SSB signal can be expressed as:

s_{\text{SSB}}(t) = A_m \cos(2 \pi (f_c + f_m) t) \quad \text{or} \quad A_m \cos(2 \pi (f_c - f_m) t)

Here, either the upper sideband (USB) or the lower sideband (LSB) is transmitted, but not both. Carson’s theoretical framework paved the way for the practical development and adoption of SSB.

Early Experimental Implementations

First SSB Transmissions by AT&T (1918)

The first practical implementation of Carson’s ideas occurred at AT&T. In 1918, AT&T engineers conducted the first SSB transmissions, proving the concept in real-world conditions. These early experiments demonstrated the potential of SSB to use bandwidth more efficiently and reduce the power required for long-distance communication. The suppression of the carrier and one sideband allowed more signals to occupy the same spectrum, addressing the issues of spectrum congestion and power inefficiency inherent in AM.

Transatlantic Tests and Commercial Adoption

Following these early experiments, AT&T conducted transatlantic tests using SSB to further validate the technology’s viability for long-distance communication. By the 1920s, SSB had begun to see commercial adoption, particularly in applications where bandwidth and power efficiency were critical, such as transoceanic telephony and military communication. The success of these early tests demonstrated that SSB could provide clearer signals with less power, especially over long distances, making it an attractive option for various communication needs, including those of amateur radio operators.

Technical Principles of SSB

Detailed Explanation of SSB Signal Generation

Balanced Modulator

The generation of an SSB signal begins with a balanced modulator. Unlike a standard amplitude modulator, a balanced modulator suppresses the carrier during modulation, resulting in a double-sideband suppressed carrier (DSB-SC) signal. The mathematical representation of this process is given by:

s_{\text{DSB-SC}}(t) = A_m \cos(2 \pi f_m t) \cos(2 \pi f_c t)

Applying trigonometric identities, this can be decomposed into:

s_{\text{DSB-SC}}(t) = \frac{A_m}{2} \left[ \cos(2 \pi (f_c + f_m) t) + \cos(2 \pi (f_c - f_m) t) \right]

This DSB-SC signal contains both the upper sideband (USB) and the lower sideband (LSB) but lacks the carrier. The next step involves isolating one of these sidebands to produce an SSB signal.

DSBSC Modulated Output
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:DSBSC_Modulated_Output.png

Filtering Methods (Crystal Filters, Mechanical Filters)

To extract a single sideband from the DSB-SC signal, filtering methods such as crystal filters or mechanical filters are employed. Crystal filters, utilizing the piezoelectric properties of quartz crystals, provide highly selective frequency filtering, allowing precise separation of the desired sideband (USB or LSB) from the unwanted one. Mechanical filters use resonating elements like metal disks to achieve similar selectivity. By passing the DSB-SC signal through one of these filters, one sideband is removed, leaving an SSB signal with either the upper or lower sideband intact.

Comparison of SSB with AM

Spectral Efficiency

In AM, the total bandwidth of the signal is twice the maximum frequency of the modulating signal (2f_m). In contrast, SSB requires only half of this bandwidth (f_m), as it transmits only one sideband. This reduction in bandwidth allows more channels to occupy the same segment of the spectrum, addressing issues of spectrum congestion and interference.

Power Efficiency

SSB is more power-efficient than AM. In AM, the carrier and one of the sidebands consume a significant portion of the total transmitted power without adding any new information. In SSB, since the carrier and redundant sideband are suppressed, nearly all transmitted power is concentrated in the single sideband carrying the information. This results in a more efficient use of power, allowing for longer-distance communication with lower transmission power.

Types of SSB

Lower Sideband (LSB)

In LSB, the lower sideband is transmitted while the upper sideband is suppressed. LSB is typically used in amateur radio communications below 10 MHz, such as the 160, 80, and 40-meter bands. The frequency range of an LSB signal is from the carrier frequency down to the difference between the carrier and the modulating signal’s maximum frequency.

Upper Sideband (USB)

In USB, the upper sideband is transmitted, and the lower sideband is suppressed. USB is commonly used in amateur radio communications above 10 MHz, including the 20, 15, and 10-meter bands. The frequency range of a USB signal extends from the carrier frequency up to the sum of the carrier and modulating signal’s maximum frequency.

Carrier Suppression and Its Implications

In SSB, the carrier is suppressed during transmission. This suppression has several implications. Firstly, it reduces the power required for transmission, as the carrier typically consumes more power than the sidebands. Secondly, the absence of the carrier means that the receiver must use a beat frequency oscillator (BFO) to reinsert a carrier for demodulation. This process allows the original audio signal to be recovered accurately. Carrier suppression also makes SSB signals more resistant to certain types of interference and noise, as the power savings can be redirected to improve the signal-to-noise ratio in the transmitted sideband.

SSB in Amateur Radio

Introduction of SSB to the Amateur Radio Community

Early Adopters and Experiments

The adoption of SSB within the amateur radio community began in the late 1940s. Early adopters were typically experimenters and technically inclined operators who recognized the advantages of SSB over AM, including improved spectral and power efficiency. These operators built their own SSB equipment, often modifying military surplus gear to generate and receive SSB signals. Early experiments demonstrated the capability of SSB to provide clearer communication over greater distances with less power, especially in the crowded HF bands.

Resistance from AM Proponents

Despite its technical advantages, SSB initially faced resistance from many amateur radio operators who were accustomed to AM. AM had been the standard mode for voice communication, and its simplicity made it accessible to a broader range of operators. SSB required more complex equipment, both for transmission and reception, and the absence of a carrier in the transmitted signal meant that traditional AM receivers could not demodulate SSB signals without modification. This complexity, combined with the cost of new equipment, led to a slow and sometimes contentious transition period within the amateur radio community.

Key Figures in Amateur Radio SSB Development

Art Collins (Collins Radio Company)

Art Collins played a pivotal role in popularizing SSB among amateur radio operators. The Collins Radio Company, founded by Collins, was instrumental in developing and producing high-quality SSB equipment. In the 1950s, the company introduced the Collins 75A-4 receiver and the KWS-1 transmitter, which were among the first commercially available amateur radio equipment designed specifically for SSB operation. The superior performance of Collins equipment in terms of selectivity, stability, and ease of use helped to overcome many of the technical barriers to SSB adoption.

Collins KWM-2
https://collinsradio.org/cca-collins-technical-archives/fundamentals-of-single-side-band/

Don Norgaard (General Electric)

Don Norgaard was another key figure in the advancement of SSB in amateur radio. While at General Electric, Norgaard contributed to the development of SSB technology and its application in amateur radio. His work included the design and improvement of SSB transceivers, which combined transmit and receive functions in a single unit, simplifying the operation for amateur radio enthusiasts. Norgaard’s contributions helped make SSB more accessible and affordable, further encouraging its adoption.

Milestones in Amateur Radio SSB Adoption

First Amateur SSB QSO (1947)

The first known amateur radio SSB QSO (contact) took place in 1947. This event marked a turning point, demonstrating that SSB could be effectively used for amateur communication. It showcased the technical feasibility of SSB in real-world conditions and highlighted its advantages over AM, such as the ability to communicate with lower power and reduced interference.

Commercial Availability of SSB Equipment for Amateurs

By the late 1950s and early 1960s, the commercial availability of SSB equipment for amateur radio operators grew significantly. Companies like Collins Radio and others introduced SSB transceivers that simplified the operation of SSB, making it more accessible to the average amateur. The introduction of these commercial SSB transceivers allowed operators to easily switch from AM to SSB, accelerating the transition. By the mid-1960s, SSB had become the dominant mode of voice communication in the amateur HF bands, owing to its superior performance in terms of power efficiency, bandwidth conservation, and signal clarity.

Technical Challenges and Solutions

Frequency Stability Requirements

Development of Stable VFOs

Single-sideband modulation requires precise frequency stability for effective transmission and reception. Early SSB systems faced challenges in maintaining stable frequencies, especially when using variable frequency oscillators (VFOs). Minor drifts in the VFO frequency could lead to distorted audio or unintelligible signals. To address this, amateur radio equipment manufacturers developed more stable VFO designs. These included temperature-compensated circuits and improved mechanical designs to reduce drift caused by environmental changes. As a result, VFOs with enhanced stability enabled reliable SSB operation, minimizing frequency drift and improving overall signal quality.

Crystal-Controlled Oscillators

For applications requiring even higher stability, crystal-controlled oscillators were implemented. These oscillators used quartz crystals to maintain a fixed frequency with high precision. In SSB transmitters, crystal oscillators served as frequency references, providing a stable carrier signal that could be mixed with other frequencies to produce the desired SSB output. Although less flexible than VFOs, crystal oscillators were crucial in ensuring frequency accuracy, particularly for fixed-frequency SSB applications such as fixed-service stations and early transceivers.

Linear Amplification

Importance in SSB Transmission

SSB signals contain complex waveforms with varying amplitude and phase, requiring linear amplification to preserve the signal’s integrity. Non-linear amplification distorts the signal, introducing spurious emissions and making the transmitted signal difficult to demodulate accurately. Linear amplifiers are essential to ensure that the transmitted SSB signal faithfully represents the original modulating audio signal, maintaining its spectral purity and minimizing interference to adjacent channels.

Advancements in Linear Amplifier Design

The need for linear amplification in SSB led to advancements in amplifier design. Early tube-based amplifiers, such as Class A and Class AB amplifiers, were commonly used for SSB because of their linear operating characteristics. These designs were further refined to improve efficiency and reduce heat dissipation. In the 1960s and 1970s, the development of solid-state amplifiers brought additional improvements, including reduced size, lower power consumption, and increased reliability. These advancements made it easier for amateur operators to implement high-quality linear amplification in their SSB equipment.

SSB Reception Techniques

Product Detectors

SSB reception requires a product detector to demodulate the signal accurately. Unlike AM receivers that use simple envelope detectors, SSB receivers use product detectors to mix the incoming SSB signal with a locally generated carrier. This process shifts the SSB signal down to the audio frequency range, allowing the original audio information to be recovered. Product detectors are more complex than envelope detectors but are essential for extracting the information from the SSB signal with high fidelity.

Beat Frequency Oscillators (BFO)

The beat frequency oscillator (BFO) is a crucial component in SSB reception. Since SSB signals are transmitted without a carrier, the receiver must generate a local carrier signal to mix with the incoming SSB signal. The BFO provides this locally generated carrier, which is mixed with the received signal in the product detector. By carefully adjusting the BFO frequency, the receiver operator can ensure proper demodulation of the SSB signal, resulting in clear audio output. The precise tuning of the BFO is critical, as any discrepancy can lead to audio distortion or difficulty in understanding the received signal.

Impact on Amateur Radio

Increased Spectrum Efficiency

More QSOs in Limited Bandwidth

Denis Apel / flyingpixel.de / Wikipedia
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Waterfall-diagram-ft87_WSJT-X_Denis_apel.jpg

The adoption of SSB in amateur radio significantly increased spectrum efficiency. By transmitting only one sideband and suppressing the carrier, SSB reduced the bandwidth required for each signal by half compared to AM. This efficiency allowed more QSOs (contacts) to be conducted within the same segment of the radio spectrum. In crowded HF bands, this meant that more operators could communicate simultaneously without causing interference to each other, maximizing the use of the limited frequency allocations available to amateur radio.

Reduction of Interference

SSB’s narrower bandwidth also helped reduce adjacent channel interference, a common issue with AM transmissions. By occupying less spectrum space, SSB signals minimized overlap with neighboring frequencies, resulting in clearer reception and less mutual interference. This improvement was particularly beneficial during periods of high band activity, such as contests and special events, where efficient spectrum use was crucial.

Improved Weak Signal Performance

SSB offered improved performance in weak signal conditions compared to AM. Since SSB concentrates power into a single sideband, it effectively increases the signal’s strength relative to the noise floor. This characteristic made SSB more effective for long-distance (DX) communication, where signals often encounter fading and noise over extended paths. SSB allowed operators to maintain intelligible communication even under marginal conditions, expanding the possibilities for global contacts and enhancing the overall experience of amateur radio.

Changes in Operating Practices and Skills

The transition to SSB brought changes in operating practices and required new skills. Operators had to learn how to tune and demodulate SSB signals accurately, a process that required more precision than AM operation. The use of product detectors and BFOs necessitated a greater understanding of receiver operation. Additionally, SSB’s efficiency encouraged operators to adopt more disciplined frequency management and operating protocols, leading to more structured and courteous use of the amateur bands. The move to SSB also influenced the development of operating aids, such as narrowband filters and speech processors, which further improved communication effectiveness.

Evolution of Contest and DX Operations

SSB became the preferred mode for contesting and DXing due to its spectral and power efficiency. Contest operations, which involve making as many contacts as possible within a limited time, benefited from SSB’s ability to fit more stations into a given frequency range. This allowed for higher contact rates and more competitive events. In DXing, where the goal is to make long-distance contacts with rare or distant stations, SSB’s improved weak signal performance made it easier to work stations with low power or challenging propagation conditions. As a result, SSB played a crucial role in shaping modern amateur radio contesting and DXing practices, becoming the dominant voice mode on the HF bands.

SSB Beyond Amateur Radio

Adoption in Military Communications

SSB was widely adopted in military communications due to its efficient use of bandwidth and power. Military systems required reliable, long-distance communication with minimal interference, making SSB a suitable choice. Its ability to maintain clear communication over various conditions, including high noise environments, contributed to its use in tactical and strategic communication systems, particularly in the HF spectrum. The military’s adoption of SSB also led to advancements in radio equipment and techniques that later influenced civilian and amateur radio technology.

Use in Commercial and Maritime Radio

SSB found applications in commercial and maritime radio, where reliable voice communication over long distances was essential. In maritime communication, SSB replaced AM and Morse code for ship-to-ship and ship-to-shore communication, providing clearer and more efficient operation. Commercial aviation also utilized SSB for long-range HF communication between aircraft and ground stations. The adoption of SSB in these sectors improved operational efficiency and communication reliability across vast distances, particularly before the widespread use of satellite communication.

Influence on Other Modulation Techniques (e.g., ISB, VSB)

SSB influenced the development of related modulation techniques, such as Independent Sideband (ISB) and Vestigial Sideband (VSB). ISB involves the transmission of two different signals on each sideband, allowing for more complex communication, such as transmitting voice and data simultaneously. VSB, commonly used in television broadcasting, transmits a partial sideband to conserve bandwidth while preserving the signal’s essential characteristics. These techniques built upon the principles of SSB to further optimize spectrum usage and signal quality in various communication systems.

Modern Developments and Future Prospects

Digital Signal Processing (DSP) in SSB Generation and Reception

The integration of digital signal processing (DSP) has enhanced SSB generation and reception. DSP allows for more precise control of signal processing functions, such as filtering, modulation, and demodulation. In SSB transceivers, DSP can generate SSB signals with higher purity and stability, while digital filtering improves selectivity and reduces noise during reception. This digital approach simplifies the design of SSB radios, reduces the need for analog components, and enables features like automatic notch filtering and noise reduction.

Software-Defined Radio (SDR) Implementations of SSB

Software-defined radio (SDR) has further revolutionized SSB operation. In SDR, the modulation and demodulation processes are handled by software rather than hardware circuits. This flexibility allows operators to modify or update the radio’s functionality through software changes, enabling rapid experimentation and adaptation to new communication modes. SDRs can generate and receive SSB signals with high precision, and they offer capabilities such as panoramic spectrum displays and digital signal processing tools, enhancing the operator’s ability to analyze and manage signals in real-time.

Comparison with Digital Voice Modes (e.g., FreeDV)

Digital voice modes, such as FreeDV, have emerged as alternatives to SSB for voice communication. These modes use digital encoding and compression to transmit voice data within a narrow bandwidth, potentially offering improved signal-to-noise ratio and reduced interference. However, SSB remains competitive due to its simplicity and compatibility with existing analog equipment. While digital modes require more complex equipment and may be susceptible to digital artifacts under poor conditions, SSB can still provide intelligible communication even in weak signal scenarios.

Ongoing Relevance of SSB in the Digital Age

Despite advances in digital communication, SSB continues to hold relevance in the amateur radio community and beyond. Its efficiency, robustness, and widespread use make it a practical choice for voice communication, especially in HF bands where long-distance propagation is common. SSB’s compatibility with both modern and legacy equipment ensures its continued use in situations where digital infrastructure may be limited or unnecessary. While digital modes offer new possibilities, the simplicity and effectiveness of SSB ensure its ongoing presence in radio communication.

Conclusion

Recap of SSB’s Revolutionary Impact on Radio Communication

Single-sideband modulation (SSB) addressed key limitations of earlier modulation techniques like AM, offering improved spectrum efficiency and power utilization. Its ability to transmit clearer signals over long distances with reduced bandwidth and power requirements transformed radio communication. This efficiency made SSB a critical development in both amateur and professional radio use, helping alleviate spectrum congestion and enhancing the quality of voice transmissions across various domains.

Enduring Legacy in Amateur Radio and Beyond

SSB remains a foundational mode in amateur radio, influencing operating practices and communication strategies. Its adoption in military, commercial, and maritime sectors underscores its versatility and effectiveness. Despite the advent of digital communication technologies, SSB continues to be relevant due to its simplicity, robustness, and compatibility with existing infrastructure. Its ongoing use in HF bands for reliable long-distance communication cements its legacy as a key advancement in the history of radio.

Reflection on the Innovative Spirit of Radio Amateurs and Engineers

The development and adoption of SSB highlight the innovative efforts of radio amateurs and engineers. Through experimentation, technical advancements, and the pursuit of more efficient communication methods, these individuals contributed to a major evolution in radio technology. The collaborative work of early adopters, commercial innovators, and engineers not only shaped the trajectory of amateur radio but also influenced broader communication technologies. This spirit of innovation continues to drive progress in radio and communication systems today.

Appendices

Mathematical Derivations of SSB Signals

Derivation from AM Signal

The standard AM signal is given by:

s_{\text{AM}}(t) = [A_c + A_m \cos(2 \pi f_m t)] \cos(2 \pi f_c t)

Expanding this using trigonometric identities:

s_{\text{AM}}(t) = A_c \cos(2 \pi f_c t) + \frac{A_m}{2} \left[ \cos(2 \pi (f_c + f_m) t) + \cos(2 \pi (f_c - f_m) t) \right]

In SSB, either the upper sideband (USB) or the lower sideband (LSB) is transmitted. To derive an SSB signal, we suppress the carrier and one sideband, retaining only:

s_{\text{SSB-USB}}(t) = \frac{A_m}{2} \cos(2 \pi (f_c + f_m) t) or s_{\text{SSB-LSB}}(t) = \frac{A_m}{2} \cos(2 \pi (f_c - f_m) t)

Using Hilbert Transform

The Hilbert Transform can be used to create a 90-degree phase shift of the modulating signal, generating an analytic signal:

s(t) + j\hat{s}(t)

where \hat{s}(t) is the Hilbert Transform of s(t).

This complex representation allows the isolation of either the upper or lower sideband, enabling the generation of a true SSB signal.

Glossary of Technical Terms

  • Amplitude Modulation (AM): A modulation technique where the amplitude of the carrier wave is varied in proportion to the modulating signal.
  • Carrier Suppression: The process of removing the carrier frequency from a modulated signal to reduce power consumption and bandwidth.
  • Double-Sideband Suppressed Carrier (DSB-SC): A modulation scheme that transmits both sidebands but suppresses the carrier.
  • Hilbert Transform: A mathematical operation that generates a signal’s analytic representation, used in SSB generation.
  • Product Detector: A demodulator used in SSB receivers to mix the incoming SSB signal with a locally generated carrier to recover the original audio signal.

Timeline of Key Events in SSB Development:

  • 1915: John Renshaw Carson publishes “Method and Means for Signaling with High-Frequency Waves,” laying the theoretical foundation for SSB.
  • 1918: First practical implementation of SSB by AT&T for long-distance communication experiments.
  • 1947: First known amateur radio SSB QSO takes place, demonstrating the feasibility of SSB in amateur communication.
  • 1950s: Commercial availability of SSB equipment, such as the Collins 75A-4 receiver, marks the beginning of widespread adoption.
  • 1960s: SSB becomes the dominant mode for amateur HF voice communication.

Notable SSB Patents and Technical Papers:

  • John R. Carson’s Patent: “Method and Means for Signaling with High-Frequency Waves” (US Patent 1,449,382) – foundational work on SSB theory.
  • H. A. Wheeler’s Paper: “Sideband Transmission by Single-Sideband Methods” – a key paper discussing the practical aspects and benefits of SSB.
  • Collins Radio Technical Documentation: Manuals and white papers on the implementation of SSB in commercial radio equipment, providing technical details on SSB generation, reception, and equipment design.

Leave a Comment